CRUD Operations

DELETE

This article provides an overview and how-to instructions for deleting documents using the EVICT DQL operation.



Evicting Data




For complete DQL syntax, see Ditto Query Language (DQL) > EVICT

Evicting Multiple Documents in a Collection

The EVICT operation functions based on a condition, allowing updates to multiple documents simultaneously.

For example, the following snippet, once executed, purges all blue cars stored in the local Ditto store.

Swift
Kotlin
JS
Java
C#
C++
Rust


Referencing Previously Evicted Documents

Once removed, you can reference the evicted document using the mutatedDocumentIDs method on the result.

Using Evict with Sync Subscriptions



Timing Subscriptions and Evictions



In addition, take a balanced approach when using the Subscribe and Evict methods; as in, consider the advantages and drawbacks of each method and use them as appropriate for the specific needs and requirements of your app.

Key considerations for using Subscription and Eviction methods include:

  • Use Subscribe to sync more data across connected peers in the mesh; however, be mindful of potential increased network usage, which may degrade sync performance.
  • Use Evict to manage local storage capacity and improve performance by routinely purging data stored locally.

Coordinating Evictions



Swift
Kotlin
JS
Java
C#
C++
Rust


Soft-Delete Pattern



Adding a Soft-Delete Flag

To add a soft-delete pattern, set the isArchived field value to true:

Ditto Document


Querying Non-Archived Documents

To query to monitor documents that are NOT archived, establish a live query where isArchived is set to false, and then construct your live query callback.

For example, the following code demonstrates looking for documents that are not archived.

Swift
Kotlin
JS
Java
C#
C++
Rust


Removing Soft-Delete Flag

To remove the flag and reactivate the document, set the isArchived field to false:

Swift
Kotlin
JS
Java
C#
C++
Rust



Considerations



Access Frequency and Relevance Considerations

In peer-to-peer system design, there are technical tradeoffs between the amount of data synced across peers and the timeliness of access to synced data:

  • The greater the amount of data synced across connected peer devices, the more timely offline read access becomes. That is, database resilience in offline scenarios increases when there are more documents being synced across distributed peers.
  • The fewer the number of documents replicated, the less the likelihood that peer devices run out of disk space and experience memory leaks, and the performance of the peer-to-peer mesh network that interconnects them degrades.

For considerations on using the Evict and Subscribe methods, see Timing Subscriptions and Evictions.

For advanced concepts related to design tradeoffs in distributed system architecture, see Cloud-Optional Design.



Updated 12 Mar 2024
Did this page help you?